GPU vs Apple Silicon: RTX 3090/4090/5090 TFLOPS vs M3/M4/M5 Max — LLM Inference Performance Comparison
GPU vs Apple Silicon: RTX 3090/4090/5090 vs M3/M4/M5 Max — LLM Inference Performance Comparison
Hardware Specifications and Peak TFLOPS
When running large language models locally, the choice of hardware significantly impacts performance. The table below compares key specifications of NVIDIA RTX GPUs and Apple M-series Max chips.
| Hardware | FP16 Tensor TFLOPS | Memory Capacity | Memory Bandwidth |
|---|---|---|---|
| RTX 3090 | 142 TFLOPS | 24 GB GDDR6X | 936 GB/s |
| RTX 4090 | 330 TFLOPS | 24 GB GDDR6X | 1,008 GB/s |
| RTX 5090 | 419–1,676 TFLOPS (with sparsity) | 32 GB GDDR7 | 1,792 GB/s |
| M3 Max | 22 TFLOPS | Up to 128 GB | 400 GB/s |
| M4 Max | 40–50 TFLOPS (estimated) | Up to 128 GB | 546 GB/s |
| M5 Max | 80–100 TFLOPS (estimated) | Up to 128 GB | 600+ GB/s |
Prompt Processing (Filling) Performance at Different Context Sizes
Prompt processing, also known as prefilling, involves encoding a large input context. This phase is compute-bound. NVIDIA GPUs excel due to their high tensor core TFLOPS. The following table shows approximate time in seconds to process context sizes of 50k, 100k, 250k, and 500k tokens. Lower is better. Estimates assume a 13B parameter model using FP16.
| Hardware | 50k tokens | 100k tokens | 250k tokens | 500k tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTX 3090 | 2.5 s | 5.0 s | 12.5 s | 25.0 s |
| RTX 4090 | 1.2 s | 2.4 s | 6.0 s | 12.0 s |
| RTX 5090 | 0.6 s | 1.2 s | 3.0 s | 6.0 s |
| M3 Max | 12.0 s | 24.0 s | 60.0 s | 120.0 s |
| M4 Max | 8.0 s | 16.0 s | 40.0 s | 80.0 s |
| M5 Max | 5.0 s | 10.0 s | 25.0 s | 50.0 s |
Decoding Speed (Token Generation)
After prompt processing, the model generates tokens one by one. This is memory-bandwidth-bound. For models that fit within VRAM, NVIDIA GPUs are significantly faster. However, when a model exceeds VRAM, Apple's unified memory architecture maintains consistent speed without paging slowdowns.
| Hardware | Tokens per second (13B model, fits VRAM) | Tokens per second (70B model, exceeds VRAM) |
|---|---|---|
| RTX 3090 | 90 tok/s | N/A (OOM or crash) |
| RTX 4090 | 150 tok/s | N/A (OOM or crash) |
| RTX 5090 | 200 tok/s | N/A (OOM or crash) |
| M3 Max | 35 tok/s | 8 tok/s |
| M4 Max | 45 tok/s | 11 tok/s |
| M5 Max | 55 tok/s | 15 tok/s |
Unified Memory Advantage: Single M5 Max vs Multiple RTX 3090s
Apple's unified memory allows a single laptop to hold models with up to 128 GB of parameters. To match this capacity with NVIDIA, multiple GPUs are required. For example, five RTX 3090s provide 120 GB total VRAM, but this comes with significant trade-offs.
| Factor | M5 Max (128 GB) | 5x RTX 3090 (120 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Total Memory | 128 GB unified | 120 GB (5x 24 GB) |
| Maximum TFLOPS (FP16) | ~100 TFLOPS | ~710 TFLOPS |
| System Power Draw | ~50 W | ~1,750 W (350 W per card) |
| Cooling | Passive/silent | Active, loud fans required |
| Portability | Portable laptop | Stationary desktop with large chassis |
| Cost (approx.) | $6,000 | $7,500 + PSU, cooling, case |
Power Consumption, Heat, and Portability
The MacBook Pro M5 Max consumes only 30–60 W under typical LLM inference load, producing minimal heat and zero fan noise. In contrast, a single RTX 4090 draws up to 450 W, requiring robust cooling that generates noticeable noise. The multi-GPU option is even more demanding. For users who need to run large models on the go, the MacBook Pro is the only viable choice. For stationary setups where maximum tokens per second is the priority, NVIDIA remains unbeaten.
Conclusion
Choose NVIDIA RTX GPUs if your models fit within 24–32 GB of VRAM and you prioritize raw decoding speed and prompt processing throughput. Choose Apple M-series Max (especially M5 Max with 128 GB) if you need to run large models (70B+ parameters) locally, require portability and silence, or value power efficiency. The unified memory architecture of Apple gives a decisive advantage for large-scale local inference at the cost of lower peak performance.
Let's work together
Do you need more info, help with your project, or to develop an idea?
Whether it's an easy question, a quick doubt, or just a 5-minute chat, send me a message—it costs nothing and I'm always ready to help. I love discussing a problem to understand it, getting creative with solutions, and focusing on simple, reliable, and straightforward ideas that we can actuate quickly.
Contact me →